Archive for the ‘Nonfiction for kids’ Category

STEM Friday Book Review: The Case of the Vanishing Golden Frogs

Friday, September 23rd, 2011

The Case of the Vanishing Golden Frogs: A Scientific Mystery
(Exceptional Science Titles for Intermediate Grades series)
by Sandra Markle (Author)
Millbook Press (Lerner), October 2011
48 pages
Ages: 9-12

From the publisher’s web page:

Panamanian golden frogs aren’t just cute, little, and yellow. They’re also the national symbol of Panama. But they started to disappear about fifteen years ago. What’s killing them? Could it be a change in their habitat? What about pollution? Might it be a result of climate change? Follow a team of scientists working to save these frogs and protect frog populations worldwide in this real-life science mystery.

Sandra Markle is one of my favorite authors, and frogs are high on my list of favorite animals, so I was thrilled to have a chance to preview this title. And I wasn’t disappointed. The text is informative and easy to understand, but also tells a fascinating and compelling story.

Markle does a great job of capturing both the importance and the fun of science. First, she explains why the disappearance of these tiny creatures matters. Then, she lays out how the mystery unfolded: what questions different scientists asked, and how the answers led to the next piece of the puzzle–and more questions, for other scientists, etc.

In fact, that’s one of the things I appreciated most about this book: it doesn’t follow just one scientist and his or her unique work. It demonstrates how one person’s findings sparked others to advance the science, and how each used his or her own expertise and knowledge to contribute the next vital step in the ongoing process. To me, that makes science feel more accessible to kids by showing that successful scientists don’t need to solve a whole big problem, they just need to learn something new and tell others.

Aside from the masterful text, the stunning layout and design and big, bold photographs on every page make the book visually engaging throughout and are more than enough to keep young readers turning the pages to see what’s next.

In the author’s note, Markle adds this:

No tale of finding a serial killer could be more exciting than this true story. . . . But the story isn’t over yet. The amphibian killer is still at large. Perhaps, one day, one of you will become the science detective who finally stops this killer.

The book also includes a table of contents, ”how to help” section,  glossary, age-appropriate recommended resources, index, and photo credits.

To check out the rest of today’s roundup of books for kids about topics in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, head on over to this week’s STEM Friday host, Rasco From RIF!

Interview with author Audrey Vernick

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011
I’m still pinching myself about signing with Ammi-Joan Paquette at Erin Murphy Literary Agency. I’ve always known Joan and Erin are amazing, but I wasn’t expecting the close-knit, ultra-supportive group of EMLA clients who totally sweeten the pot. I set about trying to read all of their books and was thrilled to discover fellow nonfiction (and fiction!) author Audrey Vernick. I knew I wanted to get to know her better as well as  pick her brain a little, so I’m excited to be the 3rd stop on her summer 2011 blog tour!

Audrey Vernick

Laurie: Welcome, Audrey! Thanks for stopping by. Your first book, IS YOUR BUFFALO READY FOR KINDERGARTEN, was a light-hearted, hilariously funny book for the preschool set. Your second, SHE LOVED BASEBALL: THE EFFA MANLEY STORY, was a serious, passionate picture book biography. Now, here we are celebrating your return to young fiction with the release of TEACH YOUR BUFFALO TO PLAY DRUMS. (Congratulations!)

Laurie: One of the things that jumps out at me about all of your books is what a strong and unique voice they have, yet they’re totally different! As authors, we’re told, and often struggle, to find our own one true voice. . . but you’ve found two! How did you develop them? How do you switch back and forth between your BUFFALO voice and your nonfiction voice?

Audrey: I struggled with this question, because before I was published, I found it maddening the way people, especially editors, talked about voice. “It’s hard to define, but I know it when I see it.” THAT IS NOT HELPFUL! I want to give an informative answer, but the truth is that voice is the one part of the writing process that’s just there for me. I’m not at all conscious of developing voice or switching between voices. I write and it’s there.

Audrey: But as I think more about it, my brain keeps me pulling me back to the truly dreadful picture books I used to write, which had no voice at all. Before writing for kids, I wrote literary short fiction for adults (which makes writing for kids seem like a lucrative business decision). My voice was always in the short stories, but it did take me some time to get it into my children’s writing. A lot of time, actually. Something clicked into place with the buffalo books, and the best explanation I can give is that I learned to get out of my own way. I used to waste a lot of my narrative space explaining the world I created and why characters acted as they did. Now I state it and move on. And that, somehow, cleared out the room my voice had been waiting for.

Audrey: Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about voice in nonfiction. I really admire some voice-heavy nonfiction books, and I’m playing around with that, at least in my head, for the nonfiction project I’ve been working on for years. The examples that come to mind are both baseball books–Kadir Nelson’s WE ARE THE SHIP, about as perfect as a book could be (though maybe more for adult readers of children’s books than for children), and the wonderful YOU NEVER HEARD OF SANDY KOUFAX? by Jonah Winter (illustrated by Andre Carrilho). Those books deliver on three fronts, where I was only expecting two–information about a subject in which I was interested, gorgeous art, and the bonus: a really interesting voice to tell the story.

Laurie: You also have a novel coming out this fall. How did you find that voice, and how is it like or unlike the two we’ve already seen?

Audrey: The voice in WATER BALLOON is truest to… me. To who I am. Not necessarily who I was at thirteen, the age of the book’s narrator/protagonist, but who I am now, distilled back to a younger age. 

Audrey: I started this book seven years ago and the voice was the exact same in the first sentence of the first draft as it was when I completed the final revision. But man alive, did I need to work on plot. If my characters had their way, they would lounge and emote for 300 pages. 

Laurie: Another multi-talented author of both fiction and nonfiction (and fellow EMLA client) Chris Barton wrote in a guest post on Rasco from RIF, “I slide back and forth between fiction and nonfiction without really thinking much about it, my experiences with one building on the other. I suspect the youngest readers approach the two genres pretty much the same way—when you’ve explored only a smidge of the world, all books are about exploring more of it. It’s as we get older, as both readers and writers, that our tastes divide.

Laurie: I guess, for some of us, our tastes never did divide. (Perhaps because we never grew up?) Do you have a preference? Which creative process do you enjoy more: fiction or nonfiction?

Audrey: I think writing funny comes more naturally and is more fun. Writing nonfiction is harder. But sometimes there’s a greater satisfaction in successfully completing a difficult task. And I feel something that’s found at the crossroads of pride and delight at sharing someone else’s story with a wide audience. 

Audrey: I wouldn’t say I’m drawn to nonfiction as a whole, though. Some individual stories just call me. And while it’s obvious that some of them are baseball–in the case of my first book, BARK & TIM, it was a painting. I have likened seeing Tim Brown’s painting to the human-interest story I once read about a woman who saw a news story about an orphan in another country and had this immediate, strong knowledge: That’s my son. It was that strong when I saw “Feeding Bark.” That’s MY painting. My art. My story. For the playful, fiction books, I’m simply drawn in by the strong pull/desire to write something funny.

Laurie: Chris also wrote, “based on my own experiences slipping back and forth between genres, I believe they might even find inspiration for their next fiction project.

Laurie: Do you also find that one informs the other? Do you need to do both to stay balanced? Where do you pull such different ideas from? Do you think they come from the same place somehow?

Audrey: Both kinds of stories—fiction and nonfiction—call to me. I don’t go seeking story ideas. I find myself wondering about something or someone (nonfiction) and wanting to explore to find out more. Usually in the case of fiction picture books, I say something, though sometimes I just think it, and it echoes until I start looking at it for story potential. The closest I’ve come to one informing the other was when reading a particular kind of nonfiction picture book—the spate of inter-species friendship books—led to writing a fiction spoof of the genre, the upcoming BOGART & VINNIE.

Laurie: Do you tend to work on fiction projects and nonfiction projects at the same time? Or do you keep them completely separate?

Audrey: I work on them simultaneously. I don’t have any trouble switching gears, for the most part.

Laurie: How is your process different for something like TEACH YOUR BUFFALO TO PLAY DRUMS and SHE LOVED BASEBALL?

Audrey: I just need an idea to start writing fiction picture books. A title, a premise, a character–those have all been my starting points for different fiction picture books. For nonfiction, I need a lot of information. I need interviews, background information, etc. And I need time for the story to boil down enough that I can envision an opening scene, where an opening scene almost always naturally emerges for me when writing fiction picture books.

Audrey: When I get stuck writing nonfiction, it’s usually a good hint that I need to do more research. When I’m stuck writing fiction, it’s kind of my own problem to fix. After waiting a few days to see if an answer comes to me, I’ll sometimes try to sit down and write five possible ways out. This usually works. One thing I’ve done when stuck writing both fiction and nonfiction, with success, is talk it through with smart people. 

Audrey: The editing process is similar in that both are almost always about stripping away to find the essential story. With nonfiction, it’s wrenching, because you’re cutting away parts of a life. I still mourn for a scene in SHE LOVED BASEBALL. I find it more satisfying with fiction, because for me, my humor usually comes through best when it’s in a stark, brief form. But that’s not how I write it–that happens in revision. 


Laurie: What are you working on now?

Audrey: I am revising a recently acquired picture book entitled BOGART & VINNIE, A COMPLETELY MADE-UP STORY OF TRUE FRIENDSHIP. I find myself in the new-to-me situation of turning a character from a potbellied pig into a rhinoceros. 

Audrey: I’m also planning to start a new upper middle-grade novel this summer, which scares me more than any other kind of writing. Novels are so consuming and, for me, really hard! I know a lot about my main character and her situation, about where she starts and where she’ll end up, but getting her to move and do things has proven to be a challenge. 

Audrey: Mixed in there are a couple of other picture book projects–mostly fiction, with one nonfiction–that I return to every now and then. And one new one that’s just starting to scratch its way to the surface. 

Laurie: What do you most want people to know about you as an author and as a person?

Audrey: That is a big question.

Audrey: I’m a big reader. The moments I love best as a reader are the ones that make me laugh, or the ones I HAVE to read aloud or paste into an email for someone else whom I know will get it exactly as I do, or stumbling upon phrasing that pleases me to my core. Most recently, it was this sentence in Ann Patchett’s STATE OF WONDER, when a character receives bad news: “There was inside of her a very modest physical collapse, not a faint but a sort of folding, as if she were an extension ruler and her ankles and knees and hips were all being brought together at closer angles.” It’s not an especially important moment in the book, but those words evoked something in me. I reread them several times, with great satisfaction and pleasure. 

Audrey: As a writer, I don’t think there’s any way to consciously strive for such moments in our own writing. But I think that’s why I write–in the hope that I might provide that kind of moment for a reader. 

Audrey: As a person, boy that’s hard. When my sisters and I describe people, we always find ourselves falling upon the same rubric of funny, smart, and nice. They claim they haven’t, but I believe they have, more than once, subtly suggested that I might want to work a bit on the nice part. I am a strange combination of misanthrope and someone exceedingly fond of and loyal to the core of people I adore.

Laurie: Thanks so much, Audrey! I can’t wait to see TEACH YOUR BUFFALO TO PLAY DRUMS and all of your other upcoming projects.

Read on about Audrey, the buffalo, and more on the rest of her summer 2011 blog tour:

Save Bookstores Day haul post: fun nonfiction for kids

Monday, June 27th, 2011

We had an all too rare sunny summer day yesterday, so the family and I walked to the library (mostly to drop off oodles of books), and then we went shopping at our local independend bookstore in honor of Save Bookstores Day. My daughter was consumed by a book we had just bought at the Friends of the Library used bookstore (hopefully that counts–save libraries, too!). My husband was consumed by afternoon nap and sunshine. So, the two of them sat outside together in the sun doing their things while the boy and I went into University Book Store. I love hanging out in there. They have a great children’s department!

After much deliberation (the boy is decision-impaired), we settled first on:

Physics: Why Matter Matters by Dan Green and Simon Basher.

This nonfiction series published by Kingfisher (called the Basher series, after the common illustrator and creator) includes topics in science, math, the arts, and language arts, and each one we add to our collection holds both kids enthralled. Each one is a paper “Facebook” of what’s what in the given subject, treating each topic as a character and listing its behavior and vital statistics. They’re perfect for boys, because they feel like those game cards (Pokeman, Bakagan, Yu-Gi-Oh, and whatever else) with the stats, short descriptions, and fun art. They’re perfect for girls because they make abstract concepts characters, and suddenly we care about them (stereotypical, I know, but it sure works for my daughter and me). Highly recommended! I know our family will be buying many more.

Then, he picked out:

Mythical Creatures by James Harpur and Stuart Martin.

This one is similar in feel to the -ology books from Candlewick, which he loves. A hit, and no nightmares. Yay!

Can I just pause to say how proud I am of my nonfiction-loving boy? *smile*

Finally, I bought myself this nifty shirt:

I think it’ll be perfect to where to KidLitCon in September, which I’m already signed up for. Are you?

The kids were too busy reading to walk back home again without face-planting somewhere along the way, so we all hopped on the bus back home.

Did you make it out for Save Bookstores Day? What did you buy?

Author Interview with George Sullivan

Saturday, May 14th, 2011

You may remember back in February when I reviewed TOM THUMB: THE REMARKABLE TRUE STORY OF A MAN IN MINIATURE by George Sullivan.

Sullivan has written more than 100 nonfiction books for children and young adults, and he was kind enough to email me directly after the review! Isn’t that sweet? I was so tickled, I decided to take advantage of the situation to ask him a few questions and get to know him a little better. And he agreed to let me share his answers with you, so you can get to know him better, too!

LT: At this point in your career, what does a typical workday look like ?

GS: I’ve always done my writing early in the morning, beginning at least by 5:30 am, and continuing until my wife and I have breakfast around 8:30 or so. After breakfast, I put what I’ve written on my computer. The next morning, I begin by carefully editing the previous day’s work.

LT: What kinds of things do you like to do when you’re not writing?

GS: I like to play tennis in New York’s Central Park and to ride my bicycle into the different city neighborhoods—Soho, Tribeca, Nolita, etc. I like to shop for food in local markets. I like to cook. I also like to dine at nice restaurants. I like to visit the Metropolitan Museum and art galleries that feature photographs. There’s always something to do.

LT: How did you first become interested in writing about Tom Thumb?

GS: I’ve been very much interested in 19th century photographs for many years, the work of Mathew Brady, the preeminent Civil War photographer in particular. (My book, MATHEW BRADY, HIS LIFE AND PHOTOGRAPHS, was published by Dutton/Cobblehill in 1994.) I collect these photographs; I buy and sell them. Several years ago, I began to notice that small Brady card photographs taken in connection with the wedding of Tom Thumb and Lavinia Warren were always available for purchase on eBay, and for modest amounts of money. After doing some research, I learned that Tom’s wedding, which took place in New York City in October 1863, was an absolutely spectacular event, and vied with the Civil War for attention in newspapers of the day. The little card photographs of Tom, Lavinia, and other members of the wedding party were sold by the tens of thousands. No wonder they’re still easy to obtain. I began to think that Tom, as America’s first celebrity, would make a good subject for a biography—and he was.

LT: Did you do all the photo research for the book too? Can you tell us about that process?

GS: I did do the photo research for the book. I was aided enormously by the photograph curators at the Bridgeport Public Library and the Barnum Museum, also in Bridgeport (where Tom was born and brought up). Besides photographs, these institutions had large collections of illustrations–engravings from Harper’s Weekly and other publications of the time—that I was able to draw upon.

LT: Thank you so much, George. It was wonderful to hear some of the story behind this great book and “meet” the author!

If you haven’t checked out George’s TOM THUMB book yet, do! You can read more about it here.

Review: Start It Up teen nonfiction

Monday, May 2nd, 2011

START IT UP by Kenrya Rankin is a must-have resource for teen (and even middle-grade) readers who wish to start any kind of business, whether it be for profit, nonprofit, or mixed.

The book is clearly written and easy to understand, yet includes a wealth of information for young entrepreneurs. The design is clean and functional, with pullouts for quick tips, anecdotes, quotes, and recommended resources. There are also fun quizzes and helpful worksheets. All of this combines to turn what could be a dull, dry topic into a fun, encouraging yet realistic resource.

I’d bet there’s enough substance there’s enough substance in this little gem that even the most seasoned entrepreneurs (adults included!) will find something of use here. And it’s presented in such a way that even the least business-minded individuals (again, adults included!) will be inspired and able to get started in no time.

For changing a life, or changing the world, this book is a winner! For more great nonfiction books, check out the rest of the catalog at Zest Books–Teen Reads With a Twist. (And no, I haven’t been compensated in any way for this post. I received a free galley from NetGalley for review purposes only.)

This post is part of the Facts First! Nonfiction Monday roundup. Nonfiction Monday takes place every Monday at various blogs throughout the kidlitosphere, who write about nonfiction books for kids and collect all the reviews in one place. This week, the Nonfiction Monday roundup is being hosted by Jean Little Library. To see the entire schedule, please visit the Nonfiction Monday blog.

Review: I Am Tama, Lucky Cat

Monday, April 25th, 2011

You’ve probably seen the smiling cat figurine with the waving right front paw, but have you ever wondered why it’s there? Told from the cat’s point of view, this charming 32-page picture book tells children one of the possible stories behind it with straightforward prose and stunning artwork. It can be enjoyed both for the story itself and as an introduction to or study of Japanese culture. Backmatter includes an author’s note and acknowledgements. Highly recommended.

Book information:

  • Title: I Am Tama, Lucky Cat: A Japanese Legend
  • Author: Wendy Henrichs
  • Illustrator: Yoshiko Jaeggi
  • Publisher: Peachtree Publishers
  • Publication date: August 1, 2011

See other posts from this week’s Nonfiction Monday at Telling Kids the Truth: Writing Nonfiction for Children.

Note: I viewed this digital ARC via NetGalley and do not receive any compensation for this review.

Fans of FARTISTE

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011

Fartiste book cover

I’m a huge fan of Kathleen Krull‘s nonfiction books for kids, so I was surprised and disappointed to read her recent article in the Horn Book about the difficulties she and her husband have had selling their book FARTISTE! I would’ve thought a picture book biography about a performer who entertained audiences with his mastery of the art of the fart would be an easy sell, to a publisher AND on the bookstore shelves! Doesn’t it sound like the perfect idea for a kids book?

Here’s a case in point. Yesterday, my son was having a bad day. I took him to the library because he said there was a book there that he wanted. He walked straight to an empty table in the children’s area and burst into tears. Come to find out, the book he wanted had been laying out on a table the last time we were in the library together—2 weeks ago—and now, to his surprise and great disappointment, it was gone. He didn’t remember what book it was, and couldn’t tell me anything about it, except how heartbroken he was and how no other book in the whole library would do.

I walked over to the shelf, grabbed a copy of FARTISTE (which was on my mind because I’d just read the Horn Book article and was still mulling over my own aforementioned surprise and disappointment), and handed it to my sobbing, inconsolable boy. “What’s this?” he asked skeptically, sticking out his bottom lip. I told him. Curious, he opened it up and read the first page. Engaged, he sank down to sit criss-cross in the floor in the middle of the aisle. 15 minutes or so later, a perfectly composed boy closed the book and said, “Thanks, Mom. That was a great book. Let’s take it home.” And he grabbed my hand and pulled me to the checkout counter.

So, thank you, Kathleen, for the Horn Book article. And a big thank you, Kathleen and Paul, from both of us, for sticking with FARTISTE. You have fans!

More thoughts on the speculative nonfiction debate

Tuesday, March 22nd, 2011

Roger Sutton put up this post on the Read Roger blog for continuing the discussion about Marc Aronson’s “New Knowledge” article in the Horn Book, in which Marc argues that nonfiction authors should be allowed to speculate, draw conclusions, and reveal their points of view in their books.

While I found Marc’s terminology of “new” versus “old” nonfiction to be pejorative, I do agree with his basic thesis that speculation in nonfiction can be valuable when done well (which he elaborates on here and here and here and here–all worth reading!). The “done well” part is the key, I think, and involves both laying out the foundations for your conclusions as well as explicitly pointing out to the reader what is accepted to be fact and what is speculation (by anyone, author included). Many of today’s nonfiction authors for kids, including both Marc and Jim Murphy, are already doing that, and I believe it’s a good thing.

But one anonymous commenter to Rogers’s post distrusts this approach:

“The new NF seems to be all about embracing the slant and deliberately writing non-fiction from a specific viewpoint. Whether I agree with the author or not, I think it’s perilously close to propaganda and I don’t like it.”

Okay, I can understand the fears behind a viewpoint like that, but ew, boy, does it make my skin crawl! Why? Because sharing an opinion based on one’s own broad and deep research, and then openly stating that it is your opinion, is NOTHING like propaganda! Propaganda would be making a slant by manipulating the research or by not admitting where the facts stopped and conjecture began. A good nonfiction author would NEVER consider doing either one. And any work that tried to would be quickly called out and criticized.

In our polarized, conflicted society we need more opportunities to share well-reasoned opinions with each other, not less. This kind of debate based on the interpretation of known facts is how we move society forward. Equating opinions backed up by rational arguments with propaganda gives us permission to ignore them, permission to stay stuck in our old ways, permission to hate. I may disagree with you, but I’d love to know how you came to your opinion so I can understand it better, so we can at least have a conversation about it. And if you ask me to explain mine, to back it up, to justify it, I just might discover that it really doesn’t hold water and I have to readjust my thinking.

Marc responds to the propaganda comment himself here. In his post, he says:

“Propaganda is writing in which the goal of influencing the reader is paramount — you select what you say and how you say it to manipulate, entrance, alarm, convince the audience. It is a form of advertising. Any book I write, edit, or praise lives and dies by the rule of “falsification.” That is, no matter what position I begin with, or what passion I experience in writing, or what goal I have in telling the story, my first obligation is to evidence. If I find evidence that contradicts the story I had planned to tell or the message I intended to get across, or my motivation in writing, I must still share it. So long as an author does his or her best to abide by that standard, that book fits my standards for NF.”

Yes, I totally agree! He goes on to say:

“I say that writers can, if they choose, show their hands, reveal the dog they have in this fight, show their own personal passion to investigate and tell one historical story. That tells the reader why he or she might care — it is why the author cared.”

I love that—as a reader, as a parent, and as an author! Then, however, he adds this in a comment to his own post:

“I think that concern exists more broadly in kids books where NF is in this strange place where it is criticized for being dull, yet many want it to be neutral and “objective.” In other words we are both urged to take the distant voice of the textbook and criticized for doing so.”

Um, I was with you all the way, Marc, right up until you equated neutral and objective with dull and distant. I don’t believe they are, or ever will be, mutually exclusive. Good writing is good writing, whether it is speculative or not. :)

Drawing Lines in Nonfiction: “Old” vs. “New”

Thursday, March 10th, 2011

The March/April 2011 issue of The Horn Book Magazine is a special issue devoted to “Fact, Fiction, and In Between.” It’s a fantastic compendium of articles and notes from some of today’s top writers of nonfiction for kids, and it’s giving me a lot to think about. I’ll probably post more on these thoughts later, but for now, I wanted to explore the ideas in Marc Aronson‘s article called “New Knowledge.”

Marc says that today’s “new” nonfiction is different from “old” nonfiction in that it doesn’t just present the existing work of adult scholars in a format young readers can digest, but instead discovers new knowledge and speculates on its meanings for the first time. He concludes with:

“Just as we have both realistic fiction and speculative fiction, maybe we ought to split up our nonfiction section into books that aim to translate the known and books that venture out into areas where knowledge is just taking shape.”

While I definitely admire some of the works he cites as representative of the “new” nonfiction, including Susan Campbell Bartoletti‘s They Called Themselves the K.K.K. and Tanya Lee Stone‘s  Almost Astronauts, his assertions make me nervous on a couple of levels.

First, the line of “old” versus “new” implies “not-as-good” versus “better.” I don’t think this is necessarily true. Books that take existing knowledge and synthesize it in a way that make it palatable to kids are important, and they can be very, very good. I think this is part of what rankles Jim Murphy so in his rebuttal blog post on the topic, “The Line of Difference.”

Second, by association, is that he seems to imply that speculation in nonfiction is always a good thing. I agree that it can be a good thing, if done carefully and well. But if not, speculation in nonfiction can be a very dangerous thing indeed. Now, I really don’t think Marc is saying that speculation should be done without solid research to back it up or without calling attention to the fact that it is, in fact, speculation, but there’s a chance it could be taken that way by some readers. Many a wonderful nonfiction book would be ruined if the author felt compelled to speculate beyond the facts to fit their work into a more desirable category. As a nonfiction author, I am only going to speculate on something if the subject I am writing about calls for it; I have been completely convinced I am right; I am able to explain how I came to those conclusions so readers can judge for themselves; and I’m going to tell the reader they are MY conclusions, no one else’s. Is it valuable for kids to be exposed to that kind of speculation in nonfiction? You bet! Can nonfiction be valuable and current and relevant without it? You bet! Do we need a way to distinguish between the two in this way? I don’t really think so. Good nonfiction, whether it contains high-quality speculation or not, is good nonfiction.

For me, a more useful division is between what I’ll call “straight” nonfiction version creative nonfiction. Straight nonfiction is the nonfiction I remember being exposed to as a child of the early 70s in rural Wisconsin. I admit I was an information junkie, and I would pore over our encyclopedia sets (thank you Mom and Dad!) on cold winter days, undaunted by the dry, “just-the-facts-ma’am” presentation.

But when I first read creative nonfiction, it set my brain on fire. Using fictional techniques to turn facts into a story is what I view as a bigger shift and a more useful division than the one Aronsen proposed.

If I’m doing a research project, I’ll probably want to seek out straight nonfiction so I can find the information I need quickly. Are these types of books valuable and necessary? Of course.

But if I’m reading for pleasure, simply for the joy of learning something new, by all means wrap it up in an engaging story for me! Tracy Kidder is a master at this for adults (Squee! I got to attend his lecture last week, and he’s currently working on a book about writing creative nonfiction!); Steven Johnson‘s The Ghost Map is one of the most riveting books I’ve ever read, fiction or nonfiction; and I’d count BOTH Marc Aronson AND Jim Murphy among the best doing this kind of writing, for children or adults.

As a reader, I mostly want to know if the book I’m picking up is straight nonfiction or creative nonfiction, because they serve different purposes for me, both of which I need, but at different times. I don’t need to know, when I pick it up, if a nonfiction book will have speculation or not, or if the knowledge can be found in other books. I can encounter that along the way, either in the text or in the backmatter.

So, I understand the distinction Marc was making in his article, and I greatly admire him and the other authors who are breaking new ground in their research and thinking and sharing it with young readers. I just don’t know if “old” versus “new” is a necessary or helpful division, and I find his choice of terminology to be insulting to the many wonderful authors who dedicate their lives to researching, organizing, and presenting the facts to children in their non-speculative nonfiction works.

Nonfiction Monday book review: Spiky, Slimy, Smooth

Monday, February 28th, 2011

I must admit, when my own daughter entered kindergarten and started the unit on texture, I was surprised. Yes, textures are all around us, but what’s to study? These kids are already experts. After all, they’ve been feeling textures since before they were born (often with their mouths)!

I soon realized that’s exactly the point, though. They are all around us, but do we have the words to describe them? Have we really ever thought about how things feel, or why? This isn’t important only for its scientific implications, it’s also critical for good writing! I enjoyed seeing my children go through this topic and gain a new appreciation for the things around them. And I especially loved trying to help them come up with exactly the right words to describe a common, or not so common, texture.

In SPIKY, SLIMY, SMOOTH (Lerner/April 1, 2011/32 pages/ages 4-8), Jane Brocket combines beautiful, bold photos of everyday objects with deliciously descriptive language.

While the reading level seems a bit too advanced for most kids who will likely be studying textures as part of their science curriculum, it will make a great read-aloud for their teachers looking for an engaging way to present the topic. Brocket’s text includes many interactive elements, and her kid-friendly photos will have young learners wiggling their toes, delving into their memory banks, and stretching their imaginations to experience the textures themselves.

Happy Nonfiction Monday! You can see the rest of the roundup over at Rasco from RIF here.